🔗 Share this article

Initially, Trump appeared to take a firm position concerning Ukraine. After making threats of "severe ramifications" during the summer if Putin carried on hindering truce negotiations, the former president finally introduced major sanctions on Russia's biggest energy firms, these major energy companies. This decision seriously hindered Putin's capacity to fund his military invasion in the region.

But, with his recently unveiled 28-point peace initiative for Ukraine, reportedly developed by US and Russian officials excluding Ukraine's or EU participation, Trump has clearly returned to his favorable to Russia approach.

Rewarding Military Action

This proposal would essentially favor Putin for invading Ukraine while leaving Ukraine's democracy in jeopardy. Although ringing declarations that "Ukraine's autonomy will be confirmed", significant aspects of the proposal effectively weaken that very autonomy. What represents a Russian ideal would probably be a Ukrainian nightmare.

Showing his corporate background, the former president persists to treat the situation in Ukraine as a simple land disagreement, like giving Russia a part of Ukrainian land will please the president. But, Russia's invasion is not simply about occupying a charred area of deindustrialized area in eastern Ukraine. Rather, it is about Ukraine's political system – and the Russian leader's obvious goal to eliminate it so it ceases to acts as an attractive model for the Russian citizens of the democratic leadership that Putin's growing dictatorship withholds them.

Land Concessions

While maintaining in status the currently separated Ukrainian provinces of these areas, Trump's initiative would require Ukraine to surrender the whole Donetsk province. Aside from rewarding the Russian Federation with area that its military have been unable to capture in more than a decade of conflict, this surrender would render Ukraine's defensive positions dangerously weakened.

The area is the location of the nation's highly-touted "fortress belt", the entrenched defensive positions that constitute a essential obstacle to invading forces. Trump would have Ukraine surrender these fortifications, providing Putin a unobstructed path to Kyiv if he later choose to resume the war.

Armed Forces Restrictions

Additionally, in a move that would enable additional hostilities easier for Russia, the plan would mandate the nation to cut the numbers of its armed forces from their current 800,000 to 850,000 soldiers to a limit of this lower number. Importantly, the plan imposes no equivalent restrictions on the invading army.

Apparently as a concession to Putin's attempts to portray the nation's legitimate government as Nazis, Trump's plan states: "Every Nazi doctrine and practices must be rejected and prohibited." Apparently to highlight this aspect, it demands that "The nation will hold political contests in this period" of a ceasefire agreement. Meanwhile, Trump places no requirement that the Russian leader jeopardize his authoritarian rule by conducting democratic processes in Russia.

Protection Commitments

To be sure, the proposal has the Russian Federation pledge not to "attack neighboring countries" and to "enshrine in law its stance of non-aggression towards the EU and the Ukrainian people". However given that Putin has breached comparable accords in the past – such as the 1994 agreement, in which the Russian government committed to recognize Ukraine's sovereignty in exchange for surrendering its former Soviet nuclear weapons, and the Minsk accords, in which Moscow agreed to a ceasefire and a restoration of occupied territory in the Donbas to the government – how should we believe Russia on this occasion?

This explains the Ukrainian government has been so adamant on western protection assurances. Although the initiative threatens a "immediate unified armed reaction" if the Russian Federation restart its invasion, and states that "Ukraine will receive reliable protection assurances", the details range from unclear to concerning. The plan would not just block Ukraine accession to NATO but also prevent member states from positioning forces on the nation's land, thereby preventing the peacekeeping contingent, likely commanded by European powers, on which the Ukrainian government had been relying to stop Russia from replenishing his diminished troops, re-equipping, and attacking again.

International Reaction

Another side agreement apparently would offer Ukraine with a similar to NATO protection assurance, in which any future "serious, intentional, and sustained aggression" by the Russian Federation on Ukraine "will be treated as an assault jeopardizing the peace and security of the Western nations." This implies a military response. But different from a powerful Ukrainian military – Ukraine's primary protection against renewed invasion – the success of the parallel accord would depend on the dedication of Western powers, such as Trump, to act through arms to Russia's aggression, a response they have {not